I understand that convenience is a priority, which is why we operate a telehealth system. The primary advantage is the significant reduction in time and stress—especially for office workers who find it difficult to take leave to visit a clinic. Many patients also find it easier to share their concerns more openly from the comfort of their own home. However, there are certain limitations. Traditional Korean Medicine relies on 'Mang-Mun-Mun-Jeol' (the four diagnostic methods: looking, listening/smelling, questioning, and touching). Through a screen, it is challenging to thoroughly examine a patient's complexion or tongue. Specifically, assessing the extent of 'Eohyeol' (blood stasis) or 'Dameum' (phlegm-fluid retention) is less precise than through direct pulse diagnosis. Furthermore, for patients with severe 'Bi-Heo' (Spleen deficiency/impaired digestive function), monitoring the reaction to herbal ingredients is crucial, and remote feedback can sometimes be delayed. Having learned from my own clinical experience that precision is paramount, I now strive to be extra thorough in my remote monitoring. Ultimately, it depends on your needs. If your goal is general condition management and weight loss, telehealth is a sufficient option. However, if you have multiple underlying health conditions or a rapidly changing constitution, I recommend visiting the clinic at least once. Let's discuss which approach would be most effective for your current state.