Q. How is a diet meal like chicken breast rice bowl different from the general diets I've tried before (starving or only exercising)? From the perspective of Traditional Korean Medicine, which one is better?

Patients often ask this in clinic. I was initially drawn to the idea that chicken breast is good, but after some trial and error, I saw the bigger picture. A high-protein, low-carb chicken breast bowl diet helps maintain muscle mass, prolongs satiety, and stabilizes blood sugar and insulin secretion. However, it burdens digestion. In TKM, digestion is governed by the spleen and stomach (biwi). Chicken breast has a cold nature; consuming it excessively can chill the spleen, leading to 'spleen deficiency' (biheo), which slows metabolism, causes easy swelling, and fatigue. In contrast, traditional starvation or aggressive aerobic exercise may show quick weight loss, but the loss is mostly muscle and water, not fat. TKM calls this 'qi and blood damage' (gihyeol sonsang). Insufficient qi makes the body cold; insufficient blood leads to dry skin and constipation. When metabolism drops, resuming normal eating almost guarantees rebound weight gain, often more severe. My recommendation is to blend the strengths of both approaches while preventing spleen deficiency. When eating chicken breast, cook it with warm-natured ingredients like ginger or jujube. For those with weak digestion, substitute tofu or eggs for some protein. Also, do not starve yourself; combine the diet with herbal medicine or acupuncture to eliminate phlegm-fluid (dameum) and transform your constitution without rebound. In summary, the chicken breast bowl diet excels in protein intake and satiety, while traditional dieting offers quick initial results. But both carry the same TKM risk of spleen deficiency or qi-blood damage, so caution is needed.