I was also skeptical at first about whether herbal medicine could be prescribed remotely. But the situation has changed a lot these days. Let me start with the advantages: First, it greatly reduces time and space constraints. Even if your residence changes due to business trips or moving, you can continue seeing the same doctor. Second, it's easy to exchange dietary and lifestyle feedback through regular text or app consultations. Many people find it easier to stay consistent because they no longer have to travel to appointments. Third, since there’s no waiting time, it offers good accessibility for those who need weight control urgently. However, there are clear disadvantages. The biggest is the limitation in diagnosis. In Korean medicine, pulse diagnosis (脈診) and abdominal examination (腹診) are crucial, and without direct palpation it is difficult to fully assess constitutional states such as spleen deficiency (脾虛), blood stasis (瘀血), or phlegm-fluid (痰飮). For this reason, I strongly recommend an initial in-person visit, and then combining remote follow-ups. Second, if side effects or adherence issues arise, immediate response may be delayed. Occasionally, delivery delays or communication failures also cause late arrival of medicine. Third, the remote nature may create a feeling of 'doing it alone,' weakening motivation. I have personally experienced this, so I now supplement with regular video consultations every two weeks. In summary, non-face-to-face prescription is a useful tool but not a panacea. It is a good option for those who are busy or have difficulty with in-person visits due to location. However, for safety, it is best to receive an initial in-person diagnosis. Since the pros and cons vary greatly depending on your situation, please be honest about your lifestyle and health condition during consultation so we can find the optimal approach.